Current:Home > reviewsJudge rejects effort to dismiss Trump Georgia case on First Amendment grounds -Golden Summit Finance
Judge rejects effort to dismiss Trump Georgia case on First Amendment grounds
View
Date:2025-04-14 18:26:41
A Georgia judge on Thursday denied an effort by former President Donald Trump and 14 others to dismiss the 2020 election-related case in Fulton County, ruling that the First Amendment does not protect the defendants from prosecution.
In a 14-page order, Judge Scott McAfee rejected the argument put forth by the defendants that the charges violate the First Amendment's protections of political speech and the right to petition Congress.
"[F]ree speech — including political speech — is not without restriction," McAfee wrote. "These excluded categories include speech integral to criminal conduct, fraud, or speech presenting an imminent threat that the Government can prevent."
Trump and 18 other co-defendants were indicted last year on state charges by a grand jury in Fulton County, the culmination of an investigation by District Attorney Fani Willis and her office. Prosecutors alleged the defendants worked to overturn the election results in Georgia after Trump lost the state in 2020. Trump and most of the other defendants have pleaded not guilty and denied wrongdoing, while several others have taken plea deals.
The former president faces 10 felony charges. McAfee dismissed three against him in an earlier decision.
Defense attorneys challenged the state laws underpinning the charges, saying the alleged violations were protected political speech. McAfee ruled that the First Amendment's protections do not apply, since the speech in question is "alleged to have been made in furtherance of criminal activity."
"Even core political speech addressing matters of public concern is not impenetrable from prosecution if allegedly used to further criminal activity," the judge wrote.
Steve Sadow, an attorney for Trump, said the defendants "respectfully disagree with Judge McAfee's order and will continue to evaluate their options regarding the First Amendment challenges." Sadow noted that McAfee left the door open for the defendants to raise the First Amendment issue further down the line.
In his order, McAfee said only a jury can resolve whether Trump and his allies' speech or conduct "was carried out with criminal intent," as prosecutors have claimed.
Still, he added that "accepting the allegations as true for the purposes of this pretrial challenge, as the court must, the speech alleged in this indictment is integral to criminal conduct and categorically excluded from First Amendment protections."
McAfee said defense attorneys have not presented "any authority that the speech and conduct alleged" is constitutionally protected political speech.
The sprawling racketeering case brought by Willis and her office has picked back up after an effort spearheaded by one of Trump's co-defendants to disqualify the district attorney from the prosecution derailed it for several weeks.
Michael Roman, a longtime GOP operative, accused Willis of engaging in an improper romantic relationship with one of her deputies, Nathan Wade, and alleged she financially benefited from it. Trump and seven others joined Roman's bid to remove Willis and the district attorney's office from the case, but McAfee ultimately declined to do so.
The judge instead said Willis could remain on the case so long as Wade resigned, which he did on the heels of McAfee's decision.
Willis and Wade acknowledged they were romantically involved, but said their relationship began after Wade was hired in November 2021 to work on the case involving Trump. They both forcefully denied wrongdoing, but the allegations cast a shadow over the prosecution.
The former president and the seven co-defendants asked the Georgia Court of Appeals last week to review McAfee's decision not to disqualify Willis and her office. The court has 45 days to decide whether to hear the appeal.
The Georgia case is one of four criminal prosecutions brought against the former president. A trial in Manhattan, where Trump faces 34 felony counts for falsifying business records, is set to begin this month.
His conduct surrounding the 2020 election also led to federal charges in Washington, D.C., brought by special counsel Jack Smith. The fourth prosecution, also brought by Smith in federal court in South Florida, stems from Trump's alleged mishandling of sensitive government documents after he left the White House in January 2021.
Trump has pleaded not guilty to all charges and has claimed that the prosecutions are politically motivated.
Melissa QuinnMelissa Quinn is a politics reporter for CBSNews.com. She has written for outlets including the Washington Examiner, Daily Signal and Alexandria Times. Melissa covers U.S. politics, with a focus on the Supreme Court and federal courts.
TwitterveryGood! (47)
Related
- New Zealand official reverses visa refusal for US conservative influencer Candace Owens
- Environmental Groups File Court Challenge on California Rooftop Solar Policy
- UN Considering Reforms to Limit Influence of Fossil Fuel Industry at Global Climate Talks
- Biden’s Top Climate Adviser Signals Support for Permitting Deal with Fossil Fuel Advocates
- Google unveils a quantum chip. Could it help unlock the universe's deepest secrets?
- Shell Agrees to Pay $10 Million After Permit Violations at its Giant New Plastics Plant in Pennsylvania
- A New Battery Intended to Power Passenger Airplanes and EVs, Explained
- Environmental Justice Advocates Urge California to Stop Issuing New Drilling Permits in Neighborhoods
- Global Warming Set the Stage for Los Angeles Fires
- Wildfire Haze Adds To New York’s Climate Change Planning Needs
Ranking
- Intellectuals vs. The Internet
- Nearly 1 in 5 Americans Live in Communities With Harmful Air Quality, Study Shows
- In the Florida Panhandle, a Black Community’s Progress Is Threatened by a Proposed Liquified Natural Gas Plant
- Miranda Lambert Stops Las Vegas Concert to Call Out Fans for Taking Selfies
- US wholesale inflation accelerated in November in sign that some price pressures remain elevated
- Bumble and Bumble 2 for the Price of 1 Deal: Get Frizz-Free, Soft, Vibrant Hair for Just $31
- Shell Agrees to Pay $10 Million After Permit Violations at its Giant New Plastics Plant in Pennsylvania
- Federal Hydrogen Program Is Cutting Out Local Groups, Threatening Climate Goals, Advocates Say
Recommendation
Highlights from Trump’s interview with Time magazine
Plans for I-55 Expansion in Chicago Raise Concerns Over Air Quality and Community Health
Ariana Grande Gives Glimpse Into Life in London After Dalton Gomez Breakup
Developer Confirms Funding For Massive Rio Grande Gas Terminal
Retirement planning: 3 crucial moves everyone should make before 2025
Noting a Mountain of Delays, California Lawmakers Advance Bills Designed to Speed Grid Connections
Madewell's High Summer Event: Score an Extra 25% off on Summer Staples Like Tops, Shorts, Dresses & More
Roundup Weedkiller Manufacturers to Pay $6.9 Million in False Advertising Settlement