Current:Home > MarketsThe EPA is rejecting calls for tougher regulation of big livestock farms. It’s promising more study -Golden Summit Finance
The EPA is rejecting calls for tougher regulation of big livestock farms. It’s promising more study
View
Date:2025-04-16 01:37:39
TRAVERSE CITY, Mich. (AP) — President Joe Biden’s administration Tuesday rejected pleas to strengthen regulation of large livestock farms that release manure and other pollutants into waterways, promising more study instead.
The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency said it had denied two petitions from environmental and community groups seeking revision of rules dealing with the nation’s biggest animal operations, which hold thousands of hogs, chickens and cattle.
“A comprehensive evaluation is essential before determining whether any regulatory revisions are necessary or appropriate,” an agency statement said.
In a letter to advocacy groups, Assistant Administrator Radhika Fox said EPA will look closely at its program overseeing the farms as well as existing pollution limits. The agency will establish a panel with representatives of agriculture, environmental groups, researchers and others to develop recommendations, she said.
“We want to hear from all voices and benefit from the findings of the most current research, and EPA is confident that these efforts will result in real progress and durable solutions to protecting the nation’s waters,” Fox said.
Food & Water Watch, one of dozens of organizations that petitioned EPA in 2017 to crack down on livestock pollution, said the response continues a half-century of inadequate oversight. The agency has not revised its regulations of the farms since 2008.
“Factory farms pose a significant and mounting threat to clean water, largely because EPA’s weak rules have left most of the industry entirely unregulated,” said Tarah Heinzen, legal director of Food & Water Watch. “The lack of urgency displayed in EPA’s decision doubles down on the agency’s failure to protect our water, and those who rely on it.”
Beef, poultry and pork have become more affordable staples in the American diet thanks to industry consolidation and the rise of giant farms. Yet federal and state environmental agencies often lack basic information such as where they’re located, how many animals they’re raising and how they deal with manure.
Runoff of waste and fertilizers from the operations — and from croplands where manure is spread — fouls streams, rivers and lakes. It’s a leading cause of algae blooms that create hazards in many waterways and dead zones in the Gulf of Mexico and Lake Erie.
Under the Clean Water Act, EPA regulates large farms — known as Concentrated Animal Feeding Operations, or CAFOs — covered by federal pollution permits. Federal law requires only those known to discharge waste to obtain permits, although some states make others do so.
EPA’s most recent tally, completed in May, shows 6,406 of the nation’s 21,539 CAFOs have permits.
The agency’s rules impose requirements on barns and feedlots where animals are held, plus manure storage facilities and land where manure and wastewater are spread.
While prohibiting releases to waterways, the rules make exceptions for discharges caused by severe rainfall and for stormwater-related runoff from croplands where waste was applied in keeping with plans that manage factors such as timing and amounts.
In her letter, Fox said EPA will study the extent to which CAFOs pollute waters and whether the problem is nationwide or concentrated in particular areas. It also will look into new technologies and practices that might bring improvements.
The advisory panel will have a number of meetings over 12-18 months, Fox said. After EPA gets the group’s recommendations and completes its own study, the agency will decide whether new rules are needed or whether better implementation and enforcement of existing ones would be more effective.
veryGood! (56)
Related
- San Francisco names street for Associated Press photographer who captured the iconic Iwo Jima photo
- To Save Whales, Should We Stop Eating Lobster?
- This Shiatsu Foot Massager Has 12,800+ 5-Star Amazon Reviews and It’s 46% Off for Amazon Prime Day 2023
- These farmworkers thought a new overtime law would help them. Now, they want it gone
- North Carolina trustees approve Bill Belichick’s deal ahead of introductory news conference
- Denied abortion for a doomed pregnancy, she tells Texas court: 'There was no mercy'
- Is ‘Chemical Recycling’ a Solution to the Global Scourge of Plastic Waste or an Environmentally Dirty Ruse to Keep Production High?
- The EPA Is Helping School Districts Purchase Clean-Energy School Buses, But Some Districts Have Been Blocked From Participating
- Woman dies after Singapore family of 3 gets into accident in Taiwan
- Residents Fear New Methane Contamination as Pennsylvania Lifts Its Gas-Drilling Ban in the Township of Dimock
Ranking
- DoorDash steps up driver ID checks after traffic safety complaints
- Amazon Prime Day 2023 Fashion: See What Model Rocky Barnes Added to Her Cart
- Score This Sweat-Wicking Sports Bra With 25,700+ 5-Star Reviews For $17 on Amazon Prime Day 2023
- The ‘Plant Daddy of Dallas’ Is Paving the Way for Clean, Profitable Urban Agriculture
- Travis Hunter, the 2
- To Save Whales, Should We Stop Eating Lobster?
- You know those folks who had COVID but no symptoms? A new study offers an explanation
- California Regulators Approve Reduced Solar Compensation for Homeowners
Recommendation
Apple iOS 18.2: What to know about top features, including Genmoji, AI updates
Oil Companies Had a Problem With ExxonMobil’s Industry-Wide Carbon Capture Proposal: Exxon’s Bad Reputation
In a New Book, Annie Proulx Shows Us How to Fall in Love with Wetlands
Citing Health and Climate Concerns, Activists Urge HUD To Remove Gas Stoves From Federally Assisted Housing
Off the Grid: Sally breaks down USA TODAY's daily crossword puzzle, Hi Hi!
Score This Sweat-Wicking Sports Bra With 25,700+ 5-Star Reviews For $17 on Amazon Prime Day 2023
Andy Cohen Reacts to Kim Zolciak and Kroy Biermann Calling Off Their Divorce
Fracking Waste Gets a Second Look to Ease Looming West Texas Water Shortage